Own the outcome.
Give me the problem, context, and constraints. I’ll figure out what needs to happen, including when I need somebody smarter than me in the room.
Amsterdam · Operator · People leader
Teams. Systems. Operations. Products. And, more and more, things powered by AI.
I like messy problems, real ownership, smart people, and work that matters enough to care about. I’ve spent the last decade building customer and technical operations inside fast-moving technology companies, usually by turning something informal, overloaded, or underbuilt into something people can actually rely on.

Selected work
Everything below is something I actually did. Not a list of things I’m “passionate about,” not job-description filler, and not a clever way of saying I attended the meetings. I can talk at length about what was broken, what I tried, what worked, and what I’d do differently.
Team, coverage, QA, compliance workflows, phone support, reporting, CSAT, documentation, and the operating system around all of it.
Custom MCP, Zendesk, internal databases, policy guidance, customer research, and human-reviewed responses inside a locked-down Bedrock environment.
Customer Support, Customer Success, and Technical Support Engineering while the business grew roughly 10x.
Not because I mandated it. Because we made it genuinely useful to their work.
Business case, vendor diligence, negotiation, approvals, implementation, documentation, administration. Apparently I have trouble leaving useful problems alone.
What working with me is like
These aren’t aspirational values I picked because they look nice in six boxes. They’re standards I’ve used with my teams and with myself.
Give me the problem, context, and constraints. I’ll figure out what needs to happen, including when I need somebody smarter than me in the room.
Why did this happen? Will it happen again? Does the process need to change? Should we document it, measure it, automate it, or tell somebody else?
I want my team getting the credit for great work. If I approved the decision and something goes sideways, start with me.
Org charts should clarify ownership. They shouldn’t stop useful people from solving obvious problems.

There is, in fact, a person here
The thing I’m proudest of isn’t a metric. It’s that people I’ve led tend to leave better than they arrived: more capable, more confident, and better at working with the people around them.
Outside work I’m usually exploring somewhere, obsessing over coffee, lifting, going to a show, or starting a side project I absolutely did not need to start.
The last category has consumed an unreasonable amount of my free time.
What’s next
I’m especially interested in customer operations, AI enablement and transformation, technical business operations, and roles where the mandate is closer to “go make this work” than “please stay inside this box.”